Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor Chess Interface: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Sparthorse (talk | contribs) More about WP:RS |
||
Line 11:
::Why do interfaces such as [[XBoard]],[[Pychess]] and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eboard_(chess) have Wikipedia pages? How can I give some evidence of notability that gives a level of credence to my Raptor page that the other interfaces have. There seems to be no special 'evidence' for the other interfaces other than a link to their development page/website - which I have given for Raptor. The other interfaces do not have reviews either? [[User:MartinMorrison|MartinMorrison]] ([[User talk:MartinMorrison|talk]]) 20:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
:::Please read Wikipedia's [[WP:RS|guidelines on reliable sources]] which tell you that reliable sources are "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". I don't believe that Chesshive meets this standard as its a blog. As for the other articles, even if they don't meet Wikipedia's standards that does not mean this article is not required to. We treat each article independently. Thanks, [[User:Sparthorse|Sparthorse]] ([[User talk:Sparthorse|talk]]) 20:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||