Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tool Integration Language (TIL): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Computing |
→Tool Integration Language (TIL): del note SPA and COI |
||
Line 6:
Very specialised modelling language. Article was deleted once for lack of notability. The reference now added does little to improve the situation. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC) — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
* '''Delete''' Does not meet general notability. Single-purpose account and conflict of interest potential. Seems the usual sad case of a poor new user not being familiar with guidelines. Article created on the first edit of [[Special:Contributions/Mattbiehl|Mattbiehl]], who has only made edits on this article and one talking about it. The first author of the one reference is Matthias Biehl. Clearly the title does not comply with conventions (the trailing acronym in parens). An article on [[tool integration language]] might stand a better chance of survival. That is, an article on the general topic as indicated by the lower case title. It could, for example, cite the [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=664351 paper here] from 20 years ago on the subject, and give others up to and including the 2011 one on similar subjects. We generally do not consider subjects of a single student paper as notable, but wait until at least one other independent source at least mentions it. Perhaps userfy if the editor is willing to come up to speed with policy? [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 18:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||