Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: delete |
|||
Line 8:
'''Keep:''' I disagree with the above claim to delete it. I think the statement that websites have started using HTML5 instead of flash is a neutral one, unlike what you claim, simply because it is true (as an example, Youtube that was traditionally all flash, has started to provide HTML5 players for devices that don't support flash). I came to wikipedia searching for a comparision between the two technologies, and have found this article very helpful. It would be a shame to delete it and not have this comparision, especially when in the tech world, people compare the two technologies every day. - Dasarp
* '''Delete''' – I agree with samj. This is a terrible article, despite all of its sources. Any of the (little) good information can be incorporated into the HTML 5 and Flash articles in a comparison section. This is nothing more than an essay, and a poorly written one at that. Particularly bad is the [[Comparison_of_HTML5_and_Flash#Testing|testing]] section with no explanation of the testing parameters (treating CPU usage on a single, undefined machine as a value that actually matters and comparing undefined HTML5 and Flash files without even the assertion that they are somewhat comparable animations). —[[User:Danhash|danhash]] <small>([[User talk:Danhash|talk]])</small> 14:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||