Revision as of 14:27, 11 November 2011 edit Danhash (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,042 edits →Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:30, 11 November 2011 edit undo ContinueWithCaution (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 3,659 edits Voted weak keep using SimpleVoter. Next edit →
Line 10: * '''Delete''' – I agree with samj. This is a terrible article, despite all of its sources. Any of the (little) good information can be incorporated into the HTML 5 and Flash articles in a comparison section. This is nothing more than an essay, and a poorly written one at that. Particularly bad is the [[Comparison_of_HTML5_and_Flash#Testing\|testing]] section with no explanation of the testing parameters (treating CPU usage on a single, undefined machine as a value that actually matters and comparing undefined HTML5 and Flash files without even the assertion that they are somewhat comparable animations). —[[User:Danhash\|danhash]] <small>([[User talk:Danhash\|talk]])</small> 14:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC) *'''Weak Keep''' — I'd say some rewriting is necessary to make it more appropriate for wiki, and some sections need removal/addition, but it's sourced, and I'd say is notable in terms of current important browser technologies. [[User:ContinueWithCaution\|ContinueWithCaution]] ([[User talk:ContinueWithCaution\|talk]]) 17:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions