Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Add oldafdlist |
|||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
:{{la|Comparison of HTML5 and Flash}}<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTML5 vs. Flash}}</ul></div>
– (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 11#{{anchorencode:Comparison of HTML5 and Flash}}|View log]]</noinclude>) <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTML5 vs. Flash}}</ul></div>
:({{Find sources|Comparison of HTML5 and Flash}})
This [[WP:ESSAY]] is [[WP:ORIGINAL]] research and a [[WP:CONTENTFORK]] of the [[Adobe Flash]] and [[HTML 5]] articles. The subject is of questionable [[WP:NOTABILITY]] and is comparing apples to oranges (HTML+CSS+JS != HTML 5), as evidenced by the lede statement: "HTML5 can sometimes be used as an alternative to Adobe Flash". There are obvious [[WP:NPOV]] issues, no doubt due to [[WP:COI]] of the editors and with even Adobe having given up on Flash (at least on mobile and TV) in favour of HTML 5, it's unlikely anyone would write a "HTML vs Flash" article today. All in all Wikipedia would be better off if this article were deleted as it is not encyclopedic and more appropriate for someone's personal blog. -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">[[User:SamJohnston|samj]] <small><sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:Samj|in]]</font></sub><sup><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SamJohnston|out]]</font></sup></small></u> 13:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||