Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Add oldafdlist |
Keep |
||
Line 16:
*'''Weak Keep''' This article contains a significant amount of well source information which is encyclopedic in nature. In the long term, I think that this article should be summed up and merged into [[HTML5]] as a comparison to existing technologies section. [[User:Jncraton|Jncraton]] ([[User talk:Jncraton|talk]]) 17:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' into [[HTML5]]. It's a [[wp:Notable debate]] (which I can't find an actual policy about) concerning notable technologies, but it's currently a bit too close to violating [[Wikipedia:NOT#FAQ|NOT#FAQ]]. --[[User:Northernhenge|Northernhenge]] ([[User talk:Northernhenge|talk]]) 19:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Notability was clearly established in [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HTML5_vs._Flash|last year's Afd]] and [[WP:NTEMP|notability is not temporary]]. As Lambiam said in that discussion, "merging the content of this article into a specific choice between HTML5 and Adobe Flash would give [the comparison] unduly localized prominence." Afd is not for cleanup: delete the original research. There's a lot of well-referenced content. Participate in discussion to reach neutral POV. What does the eventual resolution of the conflict (i.e. Adobe backing down) have to do with the topic's relevance? Flash isn't gone, and the comparison still belongs in its own article for now. If Flash ''were'' gone, maybe it could be moved there instead, but let's not write history before it happens. Thinking from an historical perspective may be useful, though: it's clear that the article doesn't need so much detail about performance, for example. --[[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 20:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||