Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Wouter vdb (talk | contribs) |
Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 23:
*'''Keep''' I'm just a user and found this article useful (good summary, links for further reading). That alone would be reason enough for me to keep it. Of course usability of the Wikipedia is subordinate to its policy which I don't understand, but that leaves my option unaffected. [[Special:Contributions/89.0.130.44|89.0.130.44]] ([[User talk:89.0.130.44|talk]]) 13:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', i.e., '''rename/rewrite'''. The 'Flash versus HTML 5 controversy was (and still is) an important phenomenon (in its context) with lasting effects. It as such is worthy of a dedicated article that could cover the history and context of the controversy, and, potentially, discuss the merits of some of the accusations expressed by some parties involved in this controversy. Several of these aspects are covered in the current article, but needs further work. The article is slightly biased in favor of Flash, but the original motivation for deletion, however, is clearly biased in favor of HTML 5. A good article on this controversy should be neutral, as should be any evaluation of it content. --[[User:Wouter vdb|Wouter VdB]] ([[User talk:Wouter vdb|talk]]) 21:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Rewrite''' in standard table-driven format as other technical comparisons, such as [[Comparison of word processors]], [[Comparison of text editors]], [[Comparison of Linux distributions]] and [[Comparison of web server software]]. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 06:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||