Revision as of 13:25, 7 September 2010 edit Mabdul (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers 32,349 edits →Oracle Open Office: it is still OOo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:03, 19 November 2011 edit undo 85.64.103.251 (talk) →Bi-di support?: new section Next edit →
Line 162: I noticed it still said that OpenOffice.org was by Sun Microsystems. Shouldn't that be changed to Oracle? Bradj47 02:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC) :although oracle bought sun, the application is still known as OOo --> see [http://www.openoffice.org/ here]. At the moment at least. <small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap"><font color="#000">[[User talk:Mabdul\|mabdul]]</font></small> 13:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC) == Bi-di support? == which of these are supporting bi-directionality? because dreamweaver is really bad at it--[[Special:Contributions/85.64.103.251\|85.64.103.251]] ([[User talk:85.64.103.251\|talk]]) 13:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions