Revision as of 20:57, 15 November 2011 edit Theoprakt (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,012 edits →concept rather than paradigm: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:28, 19 November 2011 edit undo Ed Poor (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 59,703 edits Should self-modifying code have an example? Next edit →
Line 293: The Examples section is unnecessarily long. In fact, it is longer than the rest of the article. I propose to remove all the examples but one of C#/Java and one of Perl/PHP. --[[User:M4gnum0n\|M4gnum0n]] ([[User talk:M4gnum0n\|talk]]) 16:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC) :I could not disagree more. All of the examples are useful in understanding the issue from a programming and language implementation perspective.--[[User:Jarhed\|Jarhed]] ([[User talk:Jarhed\|talk]]) 02:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC) ::Not "too many" examples but rather '''no prominent example''' of [[self-modifying code]]. All I saw in C# and Java was code using "Reflection" to create an instance of a class. == The Java example could be more concise ==

Talk:Reflective programming: Difference between revisions