Content deleted Content added
→Tag: "The neutrality of this article is disputed" for the section Tree two-phase commit protocol: No Commitment ordering here; why tag for Commitment ordering? What about the Weikum & Vossen 2001 ref? |
|||
Line 101:
The tag links to the talk page, but no discussion on this here.
What facts in the section are not neutral (biased) and disputed? --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 23:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], you have been so eager to put the tag, like in other four articles that mention [[Commitment ordering]], that you have put this tag here for ''Commitment ordering'' (see tag in article) and you have not even noticed that Commitment ordering ''is not mentioned here at all!'' So I guess this is not an attack just on Commitment ordering but rather on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]] (you took an active part in deleting the Wikipedia article [[Yoav Raz]]). Have you read the tagged section at all? Again, I wonder what bias you see here, and why you put a tag for Commitment ordering that is not relevant here. You also have not explained what bias you see in the other four articles. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], note that the entire description of your tagged section appears in the text-book reference [[Weikum and Vossen 2001]] which completely relies on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]]'s article (which is also referenced here). Do you also accuse Weikum and Vossen with bias? This time this is obviously ridiculous. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
| |||