Revision as of 15:19, 22 November 2011 edit Kvng (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 115,948 edits →SPAM: external links ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:59, 22 November 2011 edit undo Vrenator (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 62,813 edits →SPAM Next edit →
Line 85: :Do you intend to remove entire entries or just the external links? I support removing the direct external links. Before deleting each, please consider whether they can be converted to references. I have added another banner. --[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 15:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC) :: The question I think is what is the criteria for inclusion? On many of these lists it is notability which is defined by having an article on Wikipedia, if not for the application itself at least for the company which produces it. As very few of the items listed have Wikipedia pages then maybe they should be converted to references. [[User:Vrenator\|<span style="font-family: Papyrus"><font color="green">'''''Vrenator'''''</font></span>]] [[User talk:Vrenator\|<span style="font-family: Papyrus"><font color ="green"><sup>talk</sup></font></span>]] 16:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of database administration tools: Difference between revisions