Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogramming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:29, 24 November 2011

Revision as of 01:29, 24 November 2011

Line 7:

*'''Keep''' per [[WP:NEO]], which says "to support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept", which ''this article does''. [[User:Jorgenev|<font face="Lucida Console" color="black" size="1">'''JORGENEV'''</font>]] 21:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)</small>

*<s>'''Weak delete''' per [[WP:NOR]]. I thought this was a well-referenced dictionary definition with the slightest bit of encyclopedic content. Then I started checking the content of the sources, and discovered they didn't back up the assertions in the article. While I'd be inclined to forgive the brief secondary-source coverage of the word if there were well-referenced encyclopedic content in the article, too much of it is [[WP:OR|original research]] sprinkled with somewhat-related citations.</s> --[[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 00:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)</s>

**I have tightened up the wording to be closer to the sources, I would appreciate reconsideration. [[User:Jorgenev|<font face="Lucida Console" color="black" size="1">'''JORGENEV'''</font>]] 08:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

**:Thanks. That did fix the original research problems and clarifies this discussion. See my transwiki/delete/userfy response below. --[[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 01:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)