Content deleted Content added
Line 40:
:There have been valid criticisms levied against Ada, and it would be interesting to list them and give a balanced view of their merits. But this is not what this section is doing. -- [[User:PascalLeroy|PascalLeroy]] 14:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
: Tony Hoare: "For none of the evidence we have so far can inspire confidence that this language has avoided any of the problems that have afflicted other complex language projects of the past. [...] It is not too late! I believe that by careful pruning of the ADA language, it is still possible to select a very powerful subset that would be reliable and efficient in implementation and safe and economic in use." [http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/C._A._R._Hoare -- C. A. R. Hoare] [[Special:Contributions/97.87.57.112|97.87.57.112]] ([[User talk:97.87.57.112|talk]]) 06:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
== US Department of Defense ==
| |||