Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogramming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Askadaleia (talk | contribs) |
Closing debate, result was delete |
||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. The analysis of the sources are that they are not substantial enough and that hasn't been refuted do asserting sources doesn't overcome the detailed analysis [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 18:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
===[[Brogramming]]===
:{{la|Brogramming}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogramming|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 22#{{anchorencode:Brogramming}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 17 ⟶ 23:
:::To be significant coverage the sources also need to directly address the topic. [http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-17/tech/29973802_1_bros-auto-mechanic-facebook-terms 1] does have a few sentences of content which do this. [http://bostinnovation.com/2011/08/31/the-10-commandments-of-brogramming/ 2] and [http://www.businessinsider.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-learning-brogramming-the-hard-way-2011-9 3] (the video, not the text) are substantial but don't take the topic seriously – they seem to be primarily about providing humor and propagating the meme, not reporting on it – more like primary than secondary sources. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204358004577028020203571342.html?mod=googlenews_wsj 3] provides less than one sentence of coverage. The remaining sources [http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-09-15/tech/30159050_1_engineers-facebook-break 4] [http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/08/mark-zuckerberg-pays-tribute-steve-jobs-best-he-can/41751/ 5] [http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/16/code-curls-girls/ 6] [http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/17/500-startups/ 7] merely use the word; they don't address the topic directly. --[[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 17:39, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' good article with sources to back it up. [[User:Askadaleia|Askadaleia]] ([[User talk:Askadaleia|talk]]) 09:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||