Revision as of 22:37, 24 October 2011 edit Tayste (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,675 edits Remove from project Statistics (it's not). Fix Everything2 link. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:31, 1 December 2011 edit undo 50.38.32.190 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7: ==Lead section== This article needs a coherent [[Wikipedia:Lead section\|Lead ~~section]].~~ass hole ~~—~~u ~~[[User:CatherineMunro\|Catherine]]\<sup~~should die>[[User_talk:CatherineMunro\|talk]]</sup> 19:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC) == ass hole nothing== ~~== Philosophical grounding ==~~ I think the opening reference to Hegel is pretentious and probably inaccurate. The Linstone and Turoff book ([http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/ch2a.html Chapter 2a], [http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/ch2b.html Chapter 2b]) references Hegel among other philosophers, but identifies [[John Locke\|Locke]], [[Edgar Arthur Singer\|E A Singer]] and [[C. West Churchman]] as more significant figures. Has anyone got a source for a specifically Hegelian account of Delphi, or is this "original research". --[[User:RichardVeryard\|RichardVeryard]] 16:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Delphi method: Difference between revisions