Content deleted Content added
m -bare urls, see also section, urls |
|||
Line 35:
Other researchers such as Tom Ormerod, from the Investigative Expertise Unit at Lancaster University, argue that ordinary travel anxieties could cause false positives. "'Even having an iris scan or fingerprint read at immigration is enough to raise the heart rate of most legitimate travellers,' says Ormerod."<ref name=nature1/> Others noted that the basic premise may be flawed. Steven Aftergood, a senior research analyst at the Federation of American Scientists, stated "I believe that the premise of this approach — that there is an identifiable physiological signature uniquely associated with malicious intent — is mistaken. To my knowledge, it has not been demonstrated." The Nature article in which he was quoted went on to note that Altergood is concerned that the technology "will produce a large proportion of false positives, frequently tagging innocent people as potential terrorists and making the system unworkable in a busy airport."<ref name=nature1/>
Due to the ability of the system to 'read people's thoughts', it is potentially in violation of privacy laws such as the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth]] and [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. Of particular note is radio host [[Alex Jones (radio host)|Alex Jones']] broadcast which emphasises the controversial nature of the program.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=[[YouTube]] |title=Alex Reviews DHS's FAST: The Machine That Reads "Malintent Minds" on The Alex Jones Show |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huj2ntG9MOY |accessdate=2010-03-12}}</ref>. A summary of the scientific and legal issues with the program was presented at [[DEF CON]] in 2011 by independent security researchers.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=[[DEF CON]] |title=DEF CON 19 Speakers |url=https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-19/dc-19-speakers.html#Rezchikov |acessdate=2011-11-12}}</ref>.
== See Also ==
| |||