Content deleted Content added
GimliDotNet (talk | contribs) →Cut down examples: reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 153:
:::You're correct about the scope of the article being OO. Throughout the article, we refer to "polymorphism" generally, so the additional specificity in the article title sort of slipped my mind. That would, indeed, make the javascript example not relevant. After simplifying the java example a little bit, and changing C++ to Python, I'm actually ''okay'' with it. I still think the java example is really long, but PHP is too close to Python to make a second example of it useful, and the others I'm not so sure about. I think the current state of things is okay, assuming you're also fine with it. I'll assume you are based on your above response, but let me know if you have any other concerns. — [[User:Mann_jess|<b>Jess</b>]]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">· [[Special:Contributions/Mann_jess|Δ]][[User_talk:Mann_jess|♥]]</span> 20:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
:::: Looks OK to me, I think within programming readers Java is better as it has a higher following, none programmers would probably be better served with a simpler C# example, but how many non-programmers are going to be interested in this article? I'm going to see if I can't add some references/clean up the rest of the article now. [[User:Carl Sixsmith|Carl Sixsmith]] ([[User talk:Carl Sixsmith|talk]]) 06:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
== Didn't Understand ==
This article doesn't tell what Polymorphism is. I read the article for four times. It fails to define Polymorphism. It fails to explain Polymorphism. It fails to distinguish it from function overloading.
Please -someone knowledgable- write a definition at the beginning and an explanation in the second paragraph. Then indicate the difference from overloading.--[[Special:Contributions/129.7.147.112|129.7.147.112]] ([[User talk:129.7.147.112|talk]]) 16:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||