Revision as of 19:06, 16 December 2011 edit Czarkoff (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,495 edits →Graphics Layout Engine: replied ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:29, 16 December 2011 edit undo Pnm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,752 edits Reply Next edit →
Line 14: :::None of those appear to be [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]], and I don't think they provide [[WP:SIGCOV\|significant coverage]] either. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC) ::::This is a brief second search in one search engine, which proves the ability of development for this software. Furthermore, it is used in other products, so more detail search can reveal more links. I don't think that "''I don't care''" is a good reason to make any actions. — [[User:Czarkoff\|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff\|talk]]) 19:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC) ::::: I looked for better sources, but didn't find anything suitable. There's nothing in Books except Wikipedia books. One bullet point on one set of slides in Scholar. I agree that "I don't care" isn't a good reason to delete, but it's not a good reason to keep, either. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 20:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC) '''Delete''' per [[WP:N]] for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions