Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2011/December: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '==December 2011== ===Siege-stub=== I had no idea that there was a process of getting permission to create a stub group. I created a stub today called [[Siege o...' |
→Siege-stub: ++ |
||
Line 4:
I had no idea that there was a process of getting permission to create a stub group. I created a stub today called [[Siege of Newcastle]] and as a siege is either not a battle or a type battle (depends on ones PoV) I decided to create a {{tl|siege-stub}} and a [[:category:Siege stubs]] as sub category to [[:category:battle stubs]]. I have since moved all the articles that start with the word Siege and had a {{tl|battle-stub}} template into the category. If there is a consensus not to keep the stub or the category, let me know and I'll move the score of articles back into the battle-stub category. -- [[User:Philip Baird Shearer|PBS]] ([[User talk:Philip Baird Shearer|talk]]) 03:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
:Doesn't seem a bad idea. Quite small at the moment (24 articles) but a look at how many siege articles are already stub-tagged ([http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?depth=3&categories=Sieges&templates_yes=asbox&doit=1]) suggests that with a bit of sorting there shouldn't be a problem in taking it through threshold. [[User:Severo|Severo]]<sup>''[[User talk:Severo|T]][[Special:Contributions/Severo|C]]''</sup> 11:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||