Talk:Lattice-based cryptography: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Garrapito (talk | contribs)
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 9:
: '''Disagreed'''. Ditto the above comments. Theoretical computer science has a separate existence outside of the world of cryptography. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— 15 March 2011 ([[User talk:64.100.220.139|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
: '''Disagreed'''. Ditto the above comments. Why do we have separate articles for RSA, factoring and discrete logarithms? Because one must distinguish a computational problem from its (cryptographic) applications. I think the lattice problems article should include the information related to mathematical problem, methods to tackle them and a short section for the "distinction" between its classical and quantum complexity; the cryptography page should contain the information related lattice protocols, comparison with other ones and a discussion about their robustness. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Garrapito|Garrapito]] ([[User talk:Garrapito|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Garrapito|contribs]]) 10:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->