Talk:Lattice-based cryptography: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:32, 18 December 2011

Revision as of 10:35, 18 December 2011

Line 9:

: '''Disagreed'''. Ditto the above comments. Theoretical computer science has a separate existence outside of the world of cryptography. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— 15 March 2011 ([[User talk:64.100.220.139|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: '''Disagreed'''. Ditto the above comments. Why do we have separate articles for RSA, factoring and discrete logarithms? Because one must distinguish a computational problem from its (cryptographic) applications. I think the lattice problems article should include the information related to mathematical problem, methods to tackle them and a short section for the "distinction" between its classical and quantum complexity; the cryptography page should contain the information related lattice protocols, comparison with other ones and a discussion about their robustness.

By the <small><spanway, class="autosigned">—I Precedingam [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]]not commentan addedexpert byon this particular topic but I it is related to my work; I study quantum computation and information.
[[User:Garrapito|Garrapito]] ([[User talk:Garrapito|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Garrapito|contribs]]) 10:3135, 18 December 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->