Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m →Graphics Layout Engine: fixed signature |
||
Line 14:
*:::None of those appear to be [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and I don't think they provide [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] either. – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
*::::This is a brief second search in one search engine, which proves the ability of development for this software. Furthermore, it is used in other products, so more detail search can reveal more links. I don't think that "''I don't care''" is a good reason to make any actions. — [[User:Czarkoff|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff|talk]]) 19:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
*::::: I looked for better sources, but didn't find anything suitable. There's nothing in Books except Wikipedia books. One bullet point on one set of slides in Scholar. I agree that "I don't care" isn't a good reason to delete, but it's not a good reason to keep, either. – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 20:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:N]] for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - I've added three additional references to GLE's page. As far as I know, there is no official book about GLE. Is this required for an open source software project to have earn an entry on Wikipedia? [[User:Janstruyf|Janstruyf]] ([[User talk:Janstruyf|talk]]) 13:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||