Revision as of 17:14, 18 December 2011 edit Pnm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,752 edits →Graphics Layout Engine: See WP:42 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:01, 19 December 2011 edit undo Kvng (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 116,060 edits new refs look good. why are they not WP:RS? Next edit →
Line 8: :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 01:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)</small> <del>'''Delete'''</del> - I could not establish notability either. --[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 03:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC) '''Keep''' - search reveals a lot of [[WP:NSOFT]]-compliant sources. — [[User:Czarkoff\|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff\|talk]]) 11:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC) :Would you post them? I couldn't easily find them. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 15:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC) Line 14: :::None of those appear to be [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]], and I don't think they provide [[WP:SIGCOV\|significant coverage]] either. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC) ::::This is a brief second search in one search engine, which proves the ability of development for this software. Furthermore, it is used in other products, so more detail search can reveal more links. I don't think that "''I don't care''" is a good reason to make any actions. — [[User:Czarkoff\|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff\|talk]]) 19:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC) ::::Pnm, why do you not consider these to be reliable? They look pretty good to me. I now understand what GLE is. I have withdrawn my vote until I hear back. --[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC) ::::: I looked for better sources, but didn't find anything suitable. There's nothing in Books except Wikipedia books. One bullet point on one set of slides in Scholar. I agree that "I don't care" isn't a good reason to delete, but it's not a good reason to keep, either. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 20:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC) '''Delete''' per [[WP:N]] for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. – [[User:Pnm\|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm\|talk]]) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions