Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Graphics Layout Engine: Move Kvng's response down slightly and respond
change to Keep
Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)</small>
 
*<del>'''Delete'''</del> - I could not establish notability either. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 03:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)</del>
*'''Keep''' - search reveals a lot of [[WP:NSOFT]]-compliant sources. &mdash; [[User:Czarkoff|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff|talk]]) 11:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
*:Would you post them? I couldn't easily find them. – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 15:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Line 23:
*'''Comment''': The first reference is not independent of the subject. The second reference is a download page. The third reference is unreliable. The fourth reference is a download page. How does that show notability? [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 15:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
**And the three references above - The first one is a blog. The second one is a blog. The third one allows news submissions from anyone. Really? [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 15:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Changing vote. Czarkoff refs establish notability. My reading of [[WP:USERG]] does not disqualify them. People out there clearly think this is a useful utility. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 01:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)