Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 26:
*:[[WP:SPS]] says "self-published media ... are largely not acceptable" and offers only two exceptions: (1) published experts and (2) sources writing about themselves. How does [[WP:USERG]] not disqualify all three of the sources Czarkoff posted? – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 01:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
*::I do not read the list of [[WP:USERG]] exceptions as exhaustive. The refs are a bit better than a blog or a forum. My personal criteria for [[WP:RS]] establishing notability is more permissive than for citations. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 03:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - GLE definitely worth an entry in Wikipedia. It's an active open-source software useful for documents producing. May be the actual entry should be completed with some examples of scripts and output results? --[[Special:Contributions/84.100.6.215|84.100.6.215]] ([[User talk:84.100.6.215|talk]]) 08:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)