|
The redo log is mentioned just once. The article needs to describe how it is actually used after an entry is added to the redo log. [[User:Mre5765|Mre5765]] ([[User talk:Mre5765|talk]]) 15:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
== Yoav Raz ==
== Tag: "The neutrality of this article is disputed" for the section [[Two-phase commit protocol#Tree two-phase commit protocol|Tree two-phase commit protocol]] ==
The neutrality of part of this page is disputed, as part of a wider discussion. See [[Talk:Commitment ordering]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science#User:Comps / Commitment ordering]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 14:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
The tag links to the talk page, but no discussion on this here.
What facts in the section are not neutral (biased) and disputed? --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 23:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], you have been so eager to put the tag, like in other four articles that mention [[Commitment ordering]] (specifically, [[Concurrency control]], [[Distributed concurrency control]], [[Serializability]], [[Global serializability]]), that you have put this tag here for ''Commitment ordering'' (see tag in article; visible at edit mode) and you have not even noticed that Commitment ordering ''is not mentioned here at all!'' So I guess this is not an attack just on Commitment ordering but rather on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]] (you took an active part in deleting the Wikipedia article [[Yoav Raz]]). Have you read the tagged section at all? Again, I wonder what bias you see here, and why you put a tag for Commitment ordering that is not relevant here. You also have not explained what bias you see in the other four articles. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
*[[User:Ruud Koot]], note that the entire description of your tagged section appears in the text-book reference [[Weikum and Vossen 2001]] which explicitly and completely relies on Dr. [[Yoav Raz]]'s article (which is also referenced here). Do you also accuse Weikum and Vossen with bias? This time this is obviously ridiculous. --[[User:Comps|Comps]] ([[User talk:Comps|talk]]) 00:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
::Section does not present any views but rather facts. Not even connected to [[Commitment ordering]]. Tag should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/94.230.86.34|94.230.86.34]] ([[User talk:94.230.86.34|talk]]) 05:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
| 