Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 9: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta.
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta.
Line 482:
:WikiProject X
I'm sure this isn't the only way its just the only one I could think of and I don't even know if its possible but its seems like it would make it a lot easier to distinguish the relationships between projects when dealing with multiples. Thanks. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 00:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
== class ==
 
*Hi, I created the same of this template on Turkish Wikipedia but when I add {{para|class}} parameter, it always appears "This template sayfası does not require a rating on the quality scale." Can someonebody help? [[User:Cemallamec|Cemallamec]] ([[User talk:Cemallamec|talk]]) 21:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
*:Can you give me a link to an example of this problem? &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
*::[http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Eablon:WPBannerMeta#De.C4.9Ferlendirme Look here] please. near KM (en: [[Wikipedia:GA|GA]]) it says "Bu şablon için herhangi bir değerlendirmeye yapmaya gerek yoktur" (english: This template page does not require a rating on the quality scale.).~ for this template, must we add something on MediaWiki? --[[User:Cemallamec|Cemallamec]] ([[User talk:Cemallamec|talk]]) 14:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
*:::It looks to me at though within Şablon:WPBannerMeta/kaliteölçeği it's something to do with <nowiki>{{#ifeq:{{str endswith|{{pagetype|}}|tartışma sayfası}}|evet</nowiki> but I can't be certain. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 18:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== Task forces with 2 parent projects? ==
 
Say you have a task force that is a child of two projects. I'd like to be able to have the banner add the article to the assessment categories of both projects. The most obvious way of doing this would be to add a new field, along the lines of <code>TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT_1</code> that behaves exactly like <code>TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT</code>. Ultimately, I think it might be helpful to offer this for more than two projects, but my current problem could be solved with the one new field.
 
An example of where this could be helpful is [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_China/Transportation_in_China_task_force|the transportation in China task force]]. Ideally its assessments would be shown in the China and Transport projects.
 
If there is a cleaner way to achieve the same result, I'm all ears. Thanks. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;"><span style="color:Blue;" >[[User:Haus|Haus]]</span><sup><small>[[User_talk:Haus|<span style="color:Green;">Talk</span>]]</small></sup></span> 06:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
:Yes there is a way to do this. But before I start let me clarify what you are trying to do. At the moment {{tlx|WikiProject China|2=transportation=yes}} adds the article to [[:Category:WikiProject Transportation in China articles]] (and the appropriate quality and importance subcategories). Are you saying that you want this also to add it to [[:Category:WikiProject Transport articles]]? If so, would it not be rather unnatural and unexpected that {{tl|WikiProject China}} would add articles to this category? It might be better to set up a new banner template for the Transportation in China task force and get this is add both the China and Transport categories. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
:: Thanks for the response. First off, I'm just using the Transportation in China task force as an easy-to-understand example - I have no relation to that task force. I do take your point about a new template for the Transportation in China task force, but my hope is that there is a better way.
:: Fundamentally, "Transportation in China" articles should be a subset of "Transport" articles. So, if someone rates and tags an article for "Transportation in China", why not have that same action rate and tag it for Transportation?
:: My main motivation here is that there are 59 projects that have listed themselves as children of Transport. It would probably take years, if not decades, to independently tag & assess all those articles. And then there's the matter of maintenance. I can only see minimal advantages in this approach at a huge cost.
:: Conversely, the gains in a parent project sharing the "assessment space" of its children include: a global assessment table, a global recent assessments log, a global article alerts log, and so forth. Does this make sense? Thanks! <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;"><span style="color:Blue;" >[[User:Haus|Haus]]</span><sup><small>[[User_talk:Haus|<span style="color:Green;">Talk</span>]]</small></sup></span> 16:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)