Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:33, 10 January 2012

Revision as of 14:51, 15 January 2012

Line 20:

* '''snow keep''' Tagged for AfD in under a day of creation - this simply fails [[WP:BITE]]. I'm sure that msnicki will be happy to watch the development of this brand new article, that's if we haven't driven off yet another new wiki editor. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 13:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

::Neither [[WP:SNOW]] nor [[WP:BITE]] seems to support you. With 3 of us !voting to delete and only you in favor of keep, it fails [[WP:SNOW]]. And [[WP:BITE]] says nothing about keeping new articles just because they were written by new editors, though I concede there's some discussion of this at [[WP:NPP#Be nice to the newbies|New page patrol]], but this is mostly in the context of speedy deletions, especially of pages lacking context or content. This is an AfD. It doesn't matter who wrote the article or why they did it. Content doesn't matter because that can always be fixed. All that matters here is whether the topic notable. If the sources exist, even if they're not yet cited, it's notable and we keep it. In this case, I don't think the sources exist. But you could prove me wrong with a citation and if you do, I will change my position, as I do routinely when new information is presented. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 17:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' Bite, or no bite, it is a very obscure language probably with 17 users worldwide. Not worth a page. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 14:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)