Revision as of 14:58, 17 January 2012 edit JRSpriggs (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 18,934 edits →Original research: why my choices ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:05, 18 January 2012 edit undo Glenn L (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,401 edits →Merging proposal: Agreement Next edit →
Line 183: It seems to me that the scope of this article is methods for numerical calculuation of square roots, and that the sections on continued fractions and Pell's equation do not belong here. On the other hand, the example <math>\sqrt{114}</math> expressed as a periodic continued fraction would be good in the article [[periodic continued fraction]]. Any opposite views? [[User:Isheden\|Isheden]] ([[User talk:Isheden\|talk]]) 20:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC) :None from me. In fact, I just made Pell's equation a subsection of the Continued fractions group (it was a separate section) to simplify merging the the whole thing if appropriate. I have also removed one GCF for <math>\sqrt{114}</math> that after more careful analysis proved inappropriate. — [[User:Glenn L\|Glenn L]] ([[User talk:Glenn L\|talk]]) 02:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC) == Original research ==

Talk:Square root algorithms: Difference between revisions