Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2012/January: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:15, 22 January 2012

Revision as of 13:19, 23 January 2012

Line 5:

::I didn't say that the ''category'' is redundant. {{cl|Stub-Class Sports Car Racing articles}} is definitely not redundant, because it is part of the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment|article assessment scheme]] and is intended to contain talk pages, and so is being misused here.

::I said that [[Template:Sports Car Racing stub]] is redundant. Given that sports car racing is a subset of motor sport, is it a ''significant'' subset? That is, is it possible that there are more than 60 articles which are stubs, and which cover sports car racing? See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals#Proposing new stub types - procedure]]. {{tlx|F1-stub}} is transcluded by well over 250 pages, so has justification for its existence. There are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&hidelinks=1&target=Template%3ASports+Car+Racing+stub&namespace=0 presently 23 articles] transcluding {{tlx|Sports Car Racing stub}} - can another 37 suitable candidates be found? If not, there is little purpose to {{tlx|Sports Car Racing stub}}, even if it were correctly set up. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 23:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

:::I will point out that a discussion had already started about an appropriate template for this topic. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2012/January#Sports car racing stubs|See here]]. Since we have a separate permanent category ({{cl|Sports car racing}}), I don't see why the template would be redundant. I agree that the existing template is malformed, but I support building a template based on the results of the discussion on the proposal page. [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 13:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

===Kupres, Bosnia and Herzegovina===