Content deleted Content added
m →Pattern recognition: added hyperlink |
Christian75 (talk | contribs) clean up using AWB (7916) |
||
Line 1:
[[Image:Microarray2.gif|thumb|350px|Example of an approximately 40,000 probe spotted oligo microarray with enlarged inset to show detail.]]
'''Microarray analysis techniques''' are used in interpreting the data generated from experiments on DNA, RNA, and protein [[microarray]]s, which allow researchers to investigate the expression state of a large number of genes - in many cases, an organism's entire [[genome]] - in a single experiment. Such experiments generate a very large volume of genetic data that can be difficult to analyze, especially in the absence of good gene annotation.
==Introduction==
Microarray data analysis involves several distinct steps, as outlined below. Changing any one of the steps has the potential to change the outcome of the analysis, so the MAQC Project<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.fda.gov/nctr/science/centers/toxicoinformatics/maqc/ | title = MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) Project | accessdate = 2007-12-26 | author = Dr. Leming Shi, National Center for Toxicological Research | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration }}</ref> was created to identify a set of standard strategies. Companies exist that use the MAQC protocols to perform a complete analysis.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.genusbiosystems.com/services-data.shtml |title=GenUs BioSystems - Services - Data Analysis |accessdate=2008-01-02
==Creating raw data==
Most microarray manufacturers, such as [[Affymetrix]] and [[Agilent]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chem.agilent.com/Scripts/PCol.asp?lPage=494 |title=Agilent | DNA Microarrays |accessdate=2008-01-02 |format= |work=}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>
==Background correction==
Depending on the type of array, signal related to nonspecific binding of the fluorophore can be subtracted to achieve better results. One approach involves subtracting the average
signal intensity of the area between spots. A variety of tools for background correction and further analysis are available from TIGR,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tigr.org/software/microarray.shtml |title=J. Craig Venter Institute -- Software |accessdate=2008-01-01
==Quality control==
Entire arrays may have obvious flaws detectable by visual inspection, pairwise comparisons to arrays in the same experimental group, or by analysis of RNA degradation.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Wilson CL, Miller CJ |title=Simpleaffy: a BioConductor package for Affymetrix Quality Control and data analysis |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=21 |issue=18 |pages=3683–5 |year=2005 |pmid=16076888 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/bti605}}</ref>
==Spot filtering==
Line 18 ⟶ 19:
==Aggregation and normalization==
Comparing two different arrays, or two different samples hybridized to the same array generally involves making adjustments for systematic errors introduced by differences in procedures and dye intensity effects. Dye normalization for two color arrays is often achieved by [[local regression]]. LIMMA provides a set of tools for background correction and scaling, as well an option to average on-slide duplicate spots.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limma/ |title=LIMMA Library: Linear Models for Microarray Data |accessdate=2008-01-01 |format= |work=}}</ref>
Raw Affy data contains about twenty probes for the same RNA target. Half of these are "mismatch spots", which do not precisely match the target sequence. These can theoretically measure the amount of nonspecific binding for a given target. Robust Multichip Average (RMA) is a normalization approach that does not take advantage of these mismatch spots, but still must summarize the perfect matches through [[median polish]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP |title=A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=185–93 |year=2003 |pmid=12538238 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185}}</ref> The median polish algorithm, although robust, behaves differently depending on the number of samples analyzed.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Giorgi FM, Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B |title=Algorithm-driven Artifacts in median polish summarization of Microarray data |journal=BMC Bioinformatics |volume=11 |pages=553 |year=2010 |pmid=21070630 |doi=10.1186/1471-2105-11-553 |pmc=2998528}}</ref> Quantile normalization, also part of RMA, is one sensible approach to normalize a batch of arrays in order to make further comparisons meaningful.
Line 30 ⟶ 31:
==Pattern recognition==
Commercial systems for gene network analysis such as Ingenuity<ref>
Specialized software tools for statistical analysis to determine the extent of over- or under-expression of a gene in a microarray experiment relative to a reference state have also been developed to aid in identifying genes or gene sets associated with particular [[phenotype]]s. One such method of analysis, known as Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), uses a [[Kolmogorov-Smirnov]]-style statistic to identify groups of genes that are regulated together.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, ''et al.'' |title=Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=102 |issue=43 |pages=15545–50 |year=2005 |pmid=16199517 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0506580102 |pmc=1239896}}</ref>
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
==External links==
* [http://www.bioinf.jku.at/software/farms/farms.html FARMS - Factor Analysis for Robust Microarray Summarization, an R package] —software
[[Category:Microarrays]]
[[Category:Bioinformatics algorithms]]
|