Content deleted Content added
→Simplicity vs. feature richness: how C# and Java used is important too |
→Tooo looong... to navigate... comfortably...: new section |
||
Line 96:
:*Unified arrays/collections: C# allows a "list" view on arrays and the "foreach" loop uses the unified IEnumerable interface which both arrays and collections implement. In Java, arrays and collections have not been unified; rather the "for" loop has been extended to accept both collections and arrays with the "for each" syntax. But they are actually different statements and you cannot pass an array where a list is expected. You can in C#
:Maybe the table needs to be supported by more examples? --[[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 16:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
== Tooo looong... to navigate... comfortably... ==
Hi all,
When I read this article, I found that I had to skip several sections in order to reach the stuff I was looking for. I got suspicious and downloaded the source code&emdash;a whopping '''103 KB''' of plain text! What's worse, it's got several problems like [[WP:NPOV|'''neutrality''']], [[WP:NOR|'''original research''']]... and the first section is <big>huge!</big>
<!--{{Very long}} begin-->{{Ambox
| subst = SUBST
| type = style
| class = ambox-very_long
| text = This {{#if:{{NAMESPACE}}|page|article }} '''may be [[Wikipedia:Article size|too long]] to read and navigate comfortably'''. Please consider {{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|section|moving more of the|splitting}} content into sub-articles and using this article for a [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary]] of the key points of the subject.
| date =
| cat = Articles that may be too long
}}<!--{{Very long}} end-->
Does anyone have any ideas as to how to improve this article? I already added the {{[[Template:Multiple issues|Multiple issues]]}} template to replace the others. But tinkering with templates does ''not'' improve an article.
Thanks,
[[User talk:68.173.113.106|The Doctahedron]], 02:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
| |||