Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreamSQL: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:22, 31 March 2006

Revision as of 20:40, 6 April 2006

Line 11:

**Reverting to '''Strong Delete'''. Adding ''The leading company in StreamSQL implementation and standardization is StreamBase Systems.'' (complete with link) doesn't equate to '''killed off the marketing''' in my mind. Note that [[User:Tibbetts2c|Tibbetts2c]]'s only edits have been to this article (created by [[User:Sbmarketing]]) [[User:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#00FF00">Dl</FONT><FONT COLOR="#44FF00">yo</FONT><FONT COLOR="#99DD11">ns</FONT><FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">493</FONT>]] [[User_talk:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">Ta</FONT><FONT COLOR="#00FF00">lk</FONT>]] [[User:Dlyons493|Dlyons493]] 21:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' I think this is decent enough for me to vote keep. [[User:Kotepho|kotepho]] 21:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Killed the implementation section entirely. That addresses the above point. There are multiple commercial entities using StreamSQL-like approaches to solving this problem now, so I vote to keep it.