Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreamSQL: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:40, 6 April 2006

Revision as of 21:26, 6 April 2006

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''keep (no consensus)'''. <span style="font-size:95%;">'''— [[User:FireFox|FireFox]] • [[User talk:FireFox|T]]'''</span> <span style="font-size:84%;color:darkorange">'''[21:26, 6 April 2006]'''</span>

===[[StreamSQL]]===

Found this on prod and I think it deserves an afd. This is surely ad copy that needs to be rewritten NPOV. Mentions in popular media: [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6841084/ MSNBC/Forbes.com] [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/07/14/DI2005071401271.html Washington Post (though trivial)] [http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1764976,00.asp?rsDis=Database_Legend:_How_Real_Time_Data_Analysis_Will_Transform_Society-Page002-145806 eWeek] [http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/012405edit.html] [http://www.fiteclub.org/meetings/20060315-Stonebraker.html] [http://www.cioupdate.com/trends/article.php/3583236] [http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:YbTkZyMDg-AJ:www.cs.brown.edu/~ugur/8rulesSigRec.pdf+streamsql+-streambase.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6&client=firefox-a] [http://www.databasejournal.com/news/article.php/3482751 database journal] [http://www.stephenibaraki.com/cips/v35/mstoneb.html] and more on google. '''No vote''' yet. [[User:Kotepho|kotepho]] 20:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Line 12 ⟶ 18:

*'''Keep''' I think this is decent enough for me to vote keep. [[User:Kotepho|kotepho]] 21:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Killed the implementation section entirely. That addresses the above point. There are multiple commercial entities using StreamSQL-like approaches to solving this problem now, so I vote to keep it.

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>