|
===Response===
If "anonymous IPs would never be able to escape blocks if they behaved like SPUI", that's a problem with the blocking admins, NOT with me. Your blocks were over-the-top, and you were called on it. Still you reblocked, after claiming you wanted to avoid wheel wars. If anyone was at fault there, it was you. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]] - <small>[[User:SPUI/SFD|don't use sorted stub templates!]]</small>) 08:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:The block was put back into place because you went right back to the same behavior after the unblock.<sup>[citation needed]</sup> Of course, you didn't want to mention that, did you? --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::And the unblocking admins disputed that such behaviors warranted a block. Of course, you didn't want to mention that, did you? --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]] - <small>[[User:SPUI/SFD|don't use sorted stub templates!]]</small>) 08:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:::I already did. Read my statement above. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:::In any case, this is the edit that got me: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SPUI&diff=prev&oldid=44777149] Making such an edit when you had already been unblocked, with an edit summary like that, was a violation of [[WP:POINT]], fully deserving of yet another block. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::::EXCUSE ME? ASKING TO BE UNBLOCKED WAS A VIOLATION OF [[WP:POINT]]? WHAT THE FUCK? --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]] - <small>[[User:SPUI/SFD|don't use sorted stub templates!]]</small>) 08:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:::::You were already unblocked at the time. The edit summary was a taunt. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::::::Obviously I hadn't realized I was unblocked, as no one had let me know. Read [[WP:AGF]] until its meaning sinks in. I still don't get how it's a violation of [[WP:POINT]]. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]] - <small>[[User:SPUI/SFD|don't use sorted stub templates!]]</small>) 08:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:Real demonstrative of your pattern behavior: [[User:MONGO]]'s rather nicely worded request to you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SPUI&curid=1122158&diff=46293730&oldid=46272986] and your response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MONGO&diff=prev&oldid=46293938]. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::I find it somewhat offensive when people are offended over silly things like usage of the word fuck. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]] - <small>[[User:SPUI/SFD|don't use sorted stub templates!]]</small>) 08:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Me too. Nonetheless, the revert war over state highways is more serious, and THAT'S what we oughta be discussing - not the F word, and not joke edits to some project page. <nowiki></nowiki> — [[User:Rickyrab|Rickyrab]] | [[User talk:Rickyrab|Talk]] 22:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::::I honestly don't think it's the use of the F-word per se. It's the choice of using it on articles he's making controversial or disputed edits too. Frankly if he wants to say "fuck" in the edit description on an edit to his talk page or a new article he's created or a non controversial edit... I doubt we'd even be talking about it. But in the middle of an edit war it does nothing but destroy any [[WP:FAITH]] about him, brings his motives into question, and is downright uncalled for.[[User:JohnnyBGood|JohnnyBGood]] 22:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:::::Good point.<nowiki></nowiki> — [[User:Rickyrab|Rickyrab]] | [[User talk:Rickyrab|Talk]] 22:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::::::Just testing :)<nowiki></nowiki> — [[User:Rickyrab|Rickyrab]] | [[User talk:Rickyrab|Talk]] 22:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
::::::::\ [[User:JohnnyBGood|JohnnyBGood]] 00:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Apparently I've been blocked by [[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] for using "fuck" in edit summaries, under the claim that it's disruptive. You guys win. Move the pages back. Change the infoboxes back. Your campaign of harassment was successful. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] (The only edit I'll make under this sockpuppet, so don't bother blocking it, because the autoblocker won't kick in)
== Another view ==
| 