Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Image-req-proj-bot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Discussion: approved |
m Archiving |
||
Line 1:
<noinclude>[[Category:
#A0FFA0; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].'' The result of the discussion was [[File:Symbol keep vote.svg|20px|alt=|link=]] '''Approved'''{{#ifeq:yes|yes|.}}<!-- from Template:Bot Top-->
==[[User:Image-req-proj-bot|Image-req-proj-bot]]==
{{Newbot|Image-req-proj-bot}}
Line 52 ⟶ 54:
:: It was discussed, although little feedback, no objections. [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities#Purpose of needs-photo ?]] --[[User:Traveler100|Traveler100]] ([[User talk:Traveler100|talk]]) 05:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
{{BotApproved}} – Discussion and trial both look good, and removing the template parameter seems common-sensical as otherwise you'd be leaving the talk page in a general category. The task is clearly useful and the only edits that were undone later were ones where an image had been placed in the article since a request had been made but the request had not yet been removed from the talk page; that's not the fault of the bot. I'd recommend continuing to link to relevant discussions in the Notification section as you have been so editors can contribute. (And maybe note that the bot's exclusion-compliant since you're using AWB.) Cheers! — <strong><tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt></strong> 06:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].''<!-- from Template:Bot Bottom --></div>
| |||