Wikipedia:Requests for comment/SPUI: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Kelly Martin (talk | contribs)
Fair and balanced view: remove antiendorsement
Line 172:
Once again RFC degenerates into a mindless namecalling session all around. What a shocker. Makes one wonder why such a venue even exists anymore.Please see the talk page. There is more then enough evidence of my and several other users innocence in this matter. I would request the section attacking me be removed as nothing but a personal attack at this point. The checkuser proved his and my innocence as did several other pieces of evidence at WP:AN/I and the talk page, not the least of which is [[User:JohnnyBGood]]'s admission of stalking not only myself but, [[User:SPUI]] and [[User:Rschen7754]] and that we have posted many times overlapping. As for the revert blocks, I won't apologize for anything here. That was my only recourse in slowing SPUI's crusade to rename all state route articles since I'm no admin and didn't want to start a move war, something he was more then happy to provide us according to the evidence here. [[User:Gateman1997|Gateman1997]] 08:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
[[User:Gateman1997|Gateman1997]] 08:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 
===Users that endorse this===
# --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 02:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 
==4th Outside View==