Content deleted Content added
LeoHesting (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 260:
: True, you can not catch all errors in existence - but you can catch more then the competition - and it is only fair to mention that. I will reverse your argument: When will it be understood to the general programming community that it is possible for a compiler to flag <code>Date.Day := 33</code> as an error. --[[User:Krischik|Krischik]] <sup>[[User_talk:Krischik|T]]</sup> 12:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with Dh100 - this is a puff piece. I didn't read every word but I did not see any mention of why ADA was abandoned, other than mention that compilers were slow and vendors slow in supplying them. ADA wasn't object-oriented, and when OOP took off, ADA got left behind. Now it's just creaky and outdated. ADA still lives on as PL/SQL and in that form is cursed roundly and daily. Wordy plus hard-to-read is just the beginning. --[[User:LeoHeska|LeoHeska]]
The History and the Standardization sections have no mention of Ada 2005.--[[Special:Contributions/76.83.24.57|76.83.24.57]] ([[User talk:76.83.24.57|talk]]) 06:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
| |||