Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summary of Unicode character assignments: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 16:
*'''Delete''' - the last thing we need is an out-of-date [[WP:CFORK]] of something that already exists ([[Unicode block]]). -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.73.139|202.124.73.139]] ([[User talk:202.124.73.139|talk]]) 06:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
*'''Redirect to [[Unicode block]]''' Per nom. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 10:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The current version (Unicode 5.0) was also the first version in the article, so it has never been updated. The tables can only be maintained automated (but there is no bot for this), which cuts me out of improvements. This situation is making the "to be edited for improvements is no deletion argument" unconvincing: here it is. Some column definitions are OR (e.g. Excl/Incl). And: what does the information really add to the encyclopedia? Apart from some legend entries, the page does not give much or easy insight nor oversight of the allocation issues. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 11:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
| |||