Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summary of Unicode character assignments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:17, 9 February 2012

Revision as of 08:11, 11 February 2012

Line 18:

*'''Delete'''. The current version (Unicode 5.0) was also the first version in the article, so it has never been updated. The tables can only be maintained automated (but there is no bot for this), which cuts me out of improvements. This situation is making the "to be edited for improvements is no deletion argument" unconvincing: here it is. Some column definitions are OR (e.g. Excl/Incl). And: what does the information really add to the encyclopedia? Apart from some legend entries, the page does not give much or easy insight nor oversight of the allocation issues. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 11:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

<small>Notified creator [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MBisanz&diff=prev&oldid=475926799]. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 12:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete.''' I defer to the experienced editors' assessment that this is redundant and outdated. Do not redirect; not a likely search term. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 08:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)