Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge process outsourcing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m categorized under Society topics |
→Knowledge process outsourcing: That the source is a university textbook seems to be a good thing. |
||
Line 16:
*'''Keep''' The claim of the nomination that the topic is original and not notable is blatantly false. For example, see [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eB1pul9SAIkC&pg=PA76 Methodology of Business Studies] which provides independent and detailed coverage of the topic. [[User:Colonel Warden|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 18:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
:*'''Comment'''. That book is apparently a print to order textbook assembled "For the First Semester B.Com Course at Mahatma Gandhi University".[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eB1pul9SAIkC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false] While it might indicate some level of academic interest in the buzzword phrase, I'm not sure it would get to notability, even if the text currently here were an actual article. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 21:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
::* That the source is a university textbook seems to be a good thing. For a wider assessment of the general level of academic interest in the topic, you merely need to click on the search link to Google Scholar above which lists hundreds more sources in this case. If you have not already done this, then you are not properly following the process described at [[WP:BEFORE]]. 18:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
| |||