Revision as of 15:31, 16 February 2012 edit Ihcoyc (talk \| contribs) 30,401 edits →Knowledge process outsourcing: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:46, 17 February 2012 edit undo My2011 (talk \| contribs) 720 edits →Knowledge process outsourcing Next edit →
Line 30: '''Keep''' The article's subject is notable (see [[User:Colonel Warden\|Warden]]), while the article itself is very, very poor. It's no [[WP:OR]] but has to be improved (references!). --[[User:Tom1492\|Tom1492]] ([[User talk:Tom1492\|talk]]) 09:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC) '''Comment'''. I'm not wholly convinced that academic discussions or proposals for new business models automatically make them notable. But if the consensus of the community is that this subject is in fact substantive enough to deserve coverage, I'd propose stubbing this and replacing its text entirely with a brief paragraph condensed out of Warden's source, which at least is semi-intelligible and not paywalled. - [[User:Ihcoyc\|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc\|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 15:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC) *'''Keep''' TOPIC is notable, ARTICLE is terrible. Someone should really rewrite it... [[User:My2011\|My2011]] ([[User talk:My2011\|talk]]) 19:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge process outsourcing: Difference between revisions