Talk:Quine–McCluskey algorithm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:30, 18 December 2011

Revision as of 07:35, 27 February 2012

Line 1:

{{philosophy|logic=yes|class=start|importance=}}

There seems to be an error. The article ends saying f.A,B,C,D := BC'D'+AD'+AC is "functionally equivalent to the original, verbose equation": f.A,B,C,D := A'BC'D'+...+AB'C'D+...

In the case (A B C D) = (1 0 0 1) the first expression evaluates to 0 but the second is 1.

(1 0 0 1) = m.9 is one of the "don't cares", but the sentence above says the expressions are "functionally equivalent", which is not so. I suggest the statement should make it clear they are functionally equivalent over the whole ___domain - {(1 0 0 1)}.

-ecb

[[Special:Contributions/70.156.123.197|70.156.123.197]] ([[User talk:70.156.123.197|talk]]) 07:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I am suffering difficulty in Digital Logic Design Please help me in this case