Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2012/February: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 10:
<!--PLEASE READ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Proposing_new_stub_types_-_procedure]] BEFORE PROPOSING A STUB TYPE. THE NUMBER OF ARTICLES THAT QUALIFY HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE RESULT OF YOUR PROPOSAL.-->
<!--Please add any new proposals for new stub templates / categories immediately after this line using header level 3-->
===More splits from {{cl|Pyralidae stubs}}===
Looks like the Pyralinae will also support a split by tribe. Might as well tag once and be done with it:
* {{tl|Endotrichini-stub}} / {{cl|Endotrichini stubs}}
* {{tl|Hypotiini-stub}} / {{cl|Hypotiini stubs}}
* {{tl|Pyralini-stub}} / {{cl|Pyralini stubs}}
Templates to be built first, with categories to follow, if size allows. [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 12:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
===Genera split off from {{cl|Pyralidae stubs}}===
While working on the previously requested Pyralidae split, I discovered that there were about a dozen genera that can each fill or nearly fill a category of their own. Propose templates for each of these genera, and categories for the larger ones:
| |||