Revision as of 21:12, 29 February 2012 edit TJRC (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 64,042 edits cleanup ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:16, 29 February 2012 edit undo TJRC (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 64,042 edits Old prod full Next edit →
Line 1: {{Old prod full \| nom = TenPoundHammer \| nomdate = 20120210203209 \| nomreason = Overly specific title, no sources, dubious notability. Most lawsuits do not warrant articles \| con = 86.133.211.199 \| condate = February 15, 2012 \| conreason = The SAS Institute vs. WPL case is a legal case and very important case. It is a landmark case in the European Union. It is cited as one of the most important copyright cases to come to court. }} ==Important case== The SAS Institute vs. WPL case is a legal case and very important case. It is a landmark case in the European Union. It is cited as one of the most important copyright cases to come to court. It is similar to the Borland vs. Lotus case that is on wikipedia too, therefore it is of historic interest to readers of copyright law and the software industry that the content is not deleted.<span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.133.211.199 \|86.133.211.199 ]] ([[User talk:86.133.211.199 \|talk]]) February 15, 2012</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP -->‎

Talk:SAS Institute lawsuit with World Programming: Difference between revisions