Revision as of 02:04, 4 March 2012 edit AmandaNP (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators 45,814 edits spell check + template fix ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:08, 4 March 2012 edit undo AmandaNP (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators 45,814 edits +change up Next edit →
Line 35: The negative aspects of pending changes outweigh the positive. Therefore the tool should not be used at all on the English Wikipedia.</div> {{Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1}} ~~;users who endorse this position~~ ~~<!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS -->~~ ====Position #2==== Line 44 ⟶ 43: {{Wikipedia:Pending changes/Provisional policy}} {{collapse bottom}} ~~;users who endorse this position~~ {{Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 2}} ~~<!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS -->~~ ====Position #3==== Line 51 ⟶ 50: Pending changes should be kept in the long term, but the draft policy is insufficient and/or out of step with what the community wants from the tool. Pending changes should not be rejected entirely but should remain unused until such time as there is a more complete policy in place that has been explicitly approved by the community.</div> {{Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 3}} ~~;users who endorse this position~~ ~~<!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS -->~~ {{'''[[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment/Discussion}}\|Discuss the RfC]]'''

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012: Difference between revisions