Wikipedia:Historical archive/Policy/Rules to consider: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
signing some rules
endorsing "no ignorant stub" rule
Line 542:
One of the things that makes the Wikipedia great is that anybody can contribute. Another thing that makes it great is that it encourages Wikipedians to stretch their interests and learn about new things, so that they can add to the 'pedia. A third great thing is that it's so easy to create new articles and to learn to wikify articles. The ease with which new articles can be created, however, can be seen as problematic when users get into "creation mode" and create more stubs than coherent articles. This can even be irritating, if the stub is accompanied by a "I don't know much about this -- would someone who does please write the article?" message. So...if you can't create a stub that's accurate and helpful, maybe you should leave that topic for someone else to do by choice, rather than because they feel obligated to edit.
 
Supporters of this rule include (at least):[[user:J Hofmann Kemp|J Hofmann Kemp]], [[user:Danny|Danny]], [[user:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]]
 
Opponents include: