Content deleted Content added
Hairy Dude (talk | contribs) {{redirect}} |
Hairy Dude (talk | contribs) misc edits including removing slang terms from precis of "layoff", consolidation of three paragraphs (including more geo-neutral formulation) and {{wiktionary|Furlough}} |
||
Line 5:
An individual can face '''termination of employment''', or job loss, for one of many reasons.
The most drastic termination of [[employment]] is involuntary termination, in its most severe form known as "firing"
In a [[postmodern]] [[risk economy]], such as that
Firing an employee is expensive and risky in that firings require extensive [[documentation]] (in the event of a wrongful-termination [[lawsuit]]), and because fired employees may sue their former employers, disclose [[trade secret]]s to competitors, or expose illegal practices. Finally, in the [[United States]], [[unemployment benefits]] are financed by companies, and a firm's unemployment costs increase with each worker laid off or fired. Depending on the circumstances and company policy, a fired employee may or may not be entitled to such things as a [[severance package]] and [[unemployment benefits]].
Line 25:
In some cases, an employee's off-the-job behavior could result in his losing his/her job (e.g., a drunk driving arrest, especially if the employee's principal responsibilities require driving). At some businesses, a security officer may escort a "fired" employee from the workplace to the parking lot upon his/her dismissal.
Synonyms for being "fired" include '''
====Effects of
Rarely is a decision to fire an employee arrived at lightly, or is it as dramatic as portrayed on television (such as with the [[World Wrestling Entertainment|WWE]], when [[Vince McMahon]] "fires" an employee as part of a [[angle (professional wrestling)|storyline]]) or in the movies.
Line 39:
===Discriminatory and retalitory termination===
In some cases, the firing of an employee is a discriminatory act. Although an employer may often claim the dismissal was for "[[just cause]]," these discriminatory acts are often because of the employee's physical or mental disability
Discriminatory or retalitory termination by a supervisor can take the form of administrative process. In this form the rules of the instituton are used as the basis for termination. For example, if a place of employment has a rule that prohibits personal phone calls, receiving or making personal calls can be the grounds for termination even though it may be a common practice within the organzation.
Line 52 ⟶ 48:
To avoid this, and to allow the dismissed employee to "save face" in a more "graceful" exit, the employer will often ask the employee to resign "voluntarily" from his or her position. If the employee chooses not to resign, the processes necessary to fire him or her will be pursued, and the employee will usually be fired. The resignation thus makes it unclear whether the resignation was forced or voluntary, and this opaqueness benefits both parties; for instance, the "fired" employee is more easily able to seek new employment in his/her given field.
High-profile individuals, when forced to resign from a job, will often claim that they resigned over "creative differences" or "to spend more time with
===Changes of conditions===
Firms that wish for an employee to exit
Such tactics may amount to [[constructive dismissal]], which is illegal in some jurisdictions.
===Layoffs and furloughs===
Finally, termination of employment can happen as a result of [[
If a company is in the process of either economic troubles and/or recent previous layoffs and they ask you to "cross-train" someone to fill in your duties "in case you are gone," chances are that a lay off process may proceed shortly.
[[Category:Organizational studies and human resource management]]
|