Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generative Knowledge Interviewing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
del |
|||
Line 7:
*'''Delete'''. Unreferenced, no evidence of notability - [http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Generative+Knowledge+Interviewing&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&redir_esc=&ei=rp5oT9XLDYLZ8AOlsIn2CA#q=%22Generative+Knowledge+Interviewing%22+-wiki&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=imvns&ei=wZ5oT__AHtP28QPXrqnyCA&start=90&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=a098011d516cb99e&biw=1337&bih=947 this] search yields only 92 results, even including Peet. Fails [[WP:VER]], [[WP:GNG]] and of course [[WP:SPAM]]. [[User:Andyjsmith|andy]] ([[User talk:Andyjsmith|talk]]) 15:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I had my own doubts about this concept. The references I could find all appear to point back to a single paper published by Peet et al, and all appear to be an attempt to "spread the word" (i.e. a [[WP:SPAM|promotion]] campaign). <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 15:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Blatant [[WP:SPAM|spam]] and a clearly [[WP:NPOV|not neutral]] string of [[WP:NONSENSE|glittering generalities]]: ''a methodology which aims to empower individuals and organizations to clearly identify and recognize the unconscious abilities and resources (e.g. values, strengths and capacities) they possess, and then use these hidden resources toward their work and life goals.'' - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 15:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
|