Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generative Knowledge Interviewing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cool Angel (talk | contribs) |
del |
||
Line 10:
*'''Delete'''. I was considering marking this for G11 speedy deletion myself, but decided that the promotion was a little too subtle to mark as such. Definitely too promotional for Wikipedia, though. [[User:Writ Keeper|Writ Keeper]] [[User Talk: Writ Keeper|⚇]][[Special:Contributions/Writ_Keeper|♔]] 15:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ---<span style="color:#000070; font-family:Courier" class="texthtml"> <big>[[User:Cool Angel|Angel from PAKISTAN]]</big></span > [[User talk:Cool Angel| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 15:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Since we're all here, anyway let's each take a moment to nominate entries for this articles most empty nonsense phrase or startling grade-school grammar boner. Here's mine: ''Once recovered, individuals are then able to use their essential tacit'' blah blah blah. I'm sorry... you're saying individuals do such-and-such once they've recovered? Recovered from what? Is this a rehab program? [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 23:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
| |||